SynthesisBMC pediatrics2026
Severity-related association between sleep-disordered breathing and nocturnal enuresis in children and adolescents and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to explore the association between nocturnal enuresis (NE) and sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) through a meta-analysis and evaluate the impact of different SDB severity levels on the occurrence of NE.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies were collected from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, including case-control, cohort, or cross-sectional studies. The search included the keywords, ‘Nocturnal Enuresis’ and ‘Sleep Apnea, Obstructive’, from database inception to 17 May 2024, involving children and adolescents aged 5–18 years with clear diagnoses of NE or SDB.
resultsA total of 22 studies (40,296 participants) were included, of which 20 were rated as moderate to high quality. NE patients had a 32.3% (95% CI: 28.3–36.2) SDB prevalence (SWN), while SDB patients had a 24.5% (95% CI: 15.7–33.3) NE prevalence (NWS). The meta-analysis revealed a significant positive NE-SDB association (adjusted OR = 2.85, 95% CI: 2.35–3.45), indicating SDB is an independent NE risk factor. Subgroup analyses showed that both mild SDB (e.g., habitual snoring) and moderate-to-severe SDB (e.g., OSA) were associated with higher NE risk-mild: OR 2.48 (95% CI 1.68–3.67); moderate-to-severe: OR 2.91 (95% CI 2.20–3.86), but the differences between severity strata were not statistically significant (test for subgroup differences P = 0.758).
conclusionThere is an independent positive association between NE and SDB, indicating a high prevalence of SDB among children with NE and, conversely, a high prevalence of NE among children with SDB. Both mild and moderate-to-severe SDB are associated with an increased risk of NE; however, no significant risk gradient was observed across different levels of SDB severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.