ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Perceptions of parents with children six or younger on adhering to the well-child care visit schedule.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdherence to the well-child care (WCC) visit schedule is suboptimal. Parents play an essential role in promoting their child’s health. We asked parents of children six and younger to inform us about their beliefs regarding, experiences with, and barriers to attending WCC visits.
methodsWe were guided by constructivist grounded theory (CGT) in our qualitative study of parents’ perceptions of WCC visits and the barriers they face to adherence. Forty-five English-speaking parents, all residents of Indiana, participated in semi-structured interviews from December 2023 to June 2024.
resultsParents adhered to their provider’s instructions on when to schedule WCC visits, regardless of their lack of understanding about what guides the provider’s instructions. Provider trust was a key factor in deciding to go to a visit. Once deciding to attend, preparation was needed, which included getting time off work and finding time on a provider’s schedule that aligned with their personal work schedule. The physical environment, office staff, and the provider’s behavior influenced perceptions of the visit. Analyses revealed that respondents with lower incomes and Medicaid reported the most barriers to adherence.
conclusionsParents in this study demonstrated a belief that WCC benefits their children by following their provider’s instructions to attend WCC visits even though they do not know the schedule or its purpose. Efforts to improve future adherence could include improving Medicaid processes, extending clinic hours beyond a typical workday schedule, and informing employers of the need to make provisions so families can attend WCC visits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.