ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2026
Unveiling state-specific neural dynamics in migraine with and without depressive symptom: a hidden Markov model and interpretable machine learning approach.
Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMigraine with depressive symptom (dMIG) constitutes a more severe clinical condition than migraine without depressive symptom (ndMIG), and is likely underpinned by distinct neuropathophysiology. While traditional neuroimaging has linked these clinical differences to static functional connectivity (FC) alterations, the role of dynamic brain network interactions which may more directly reflect the fluctuating nature of symptoms remains poorly understood.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, we examined the spatiotemporal brain dynamics from resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) data of 204 migraine patients (100 dMIG and 104 ndMIG), and 90 healthy controls (HCs) using Hidden Markov Model (HMM). By integrating multiple machine learning algorithms: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and Random Forest, with Shapley additive explanations (SHAP)-based interpretability analysis, we aimed to identify and elucidate potential dynamic neuroimaging biomarkers capable of distinguishing these two subtypes.
resultsSix HMM states were identified in this study. Significant differences in brain network dynamics were observed among the groups. The dMIG group showed higher transition probabilities between states 4, 5, 6 and enhanced activity in sensorimotor, dorsolateral prefrontal, and temporal regions. Conversely, the ndMIG group exhibited prolonged dwell time in state 3, a reduced global transition rate, and heightened sensorimotor activity. The XGBoost model achieved superior classification performance (test set AUC = 0.86, accuracy = 75.81%). SHAP analysis identified the fractional occupancy of states 3, 5 and 2 as the top three discriminative features.
conclusionMigraine with depressive symptom is characterized by brain state instability and co-activation of pain and mood network, while migraine without depressive symptom exhibits functional inflexibility, persistently engaging pain-related regions. These distinct spatiotemporal patterns offer biomarkers with the potential to inform subtype-specific diagnosis and therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.