ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Isolation of Clostridioides difficile from the atmospheric fine particulate matter.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clostridioides difficile is a spore−forming, obligate anaerobic bacillus commonly found in soil and the intestinal tracts of animals. It is a major cause of antibiotic−associated diarrhea (AAD) in humans. Our previous study suggested a possible environmental dissemination. To investigate whether atmospheric aerosols contribute to its spread, atmospheric aerosol samples were collected from ten geographic locations in East Asia, and the presence of C. difficile genomic sequences was assessed using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Additionally, atmospheric PM2.5 samples were collected from two sites in Japan, and analyzed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and selective culturing. C. difficile genomic sequences were detected in aerosols from 8 sampling sites, with relative abundances ranging from 0.03% to 9.88% of total prokaryotic reads. From PM2.5 samples, seven C. difficile strains were isolated, and classified into five genotypes. Three genotypes matched low−frequency clinical or environmental strains in Japan (0.1–0.6%), while two were previously unreported. Phylogenetic analysis showed that four genotypes were closely related to strains from North America, Europe, Africa, and Southeast Asia, respectively. These findings are consistent with the possibility that C. difficile may disperse globally via atmospheric aerosols. Successful colonization of C. difficile in the deposited environments likely depends on ecological adaptability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.