Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41792602›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2026

Comparative genome analysis of Pseudomonas chlororaphis strains reveals biosynthetic diversity underlying plant growth promotion and soil health improvement.

Izzah Shahid, Lucas Gabriel Castellani, Abdul Aziz Eida, Emrah Nikerel, Deeba Noreen Baig, Qurat Ul Ain Hanif, Maged M Saad, Kauser Abdulla Malik, Samina Mehnaz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Izzah ShahidInstitute of Multidisciplinary Research in Applied Biology, Public University of Navarra, Campus Arrosadia, Pamplona, 31006, Spain.
Lucas Gabriel CastellaniInstitute of Multidisciplinary Research in Applied Biology, Public University of Navarra, Campus Arrosadia, Pamplona, 31006, Spain.
Abdul Aziz EidaDARWIN21, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Emrah NikerelDepartment of Genetics and Bioengineering, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, 34755, Turkey.
Deeba Noreen BaigKauser Abdulla Malik School of Life Sciences, Forman Christian College (A Chartered University), Lahore, 54600, Pakistan.
Qurat Ul Ain HanifKauser Abdulla Malik School of Life Sciences, Forman Christian College (A Chartered University), Lahore, 54600, Pakistan.
Maged M SaadDARWIN21, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Kauser Abdulla MalikKauser Abdulla Malik School of Life Sciences, Forman Christian College (A Chartered University), Lahore, 54600, Pakistan.
Samina MehnazKauser Abdulla Malik School of Life Sciences, Forman Christian College (A Chartered University), Lahore, 54600, Pakistan. saminamehnaz@fccollege.edu.pk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe growing need for sustainable farming methods has led to increased efforts to understand plant-beneficial microbes that can serve as alternatives to chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Among these, bacteria from the Pseudomonas chlororaphis group have emerged as particularly promising candidates due to their metabolic versatility and ability to produce a diverse arsenal of bioactive compounds.

resultsIn this study, we conducted an extensive comparative genomic analysis of two Pseudomonas chlororaphis strains, FS-2 (endophytic) and RP-4 (rhizoplane-associated), to explore their plant growth-promoting and biocidal capacities. Whole-genome analysis using antiSMASH and functional annotation tools identified several biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) involved in the production of secondary metabolites, such as phenazines, pyoverdine, pyrrolnitrin, hydrogen cyanide, and the cyclic lipopeptide white line-inducing principle (WLIP). Some additional clusters with low similarity to known references, including arylpolyenes, butyrolactones, and resorcinol derivatives, were also observed within these genomes, indicating the ability to produce uncharacterized bioactive compounds. Genes for the biosynthesis of plant growth-promoting features including indole-3-acetic acid, siderophore, biofilm formation, solubilization of organic compounds, and stress adaption were also present in both genomes. Additionally, bacteriocin-like operons pyocins and colicins were also present in the genomes of FS-2 and RP-4. Average nucleotide identity analysis indicated a high level of conservation (99.58% ANI) between FS-2 and RP-4, however, differences in the genome and the presence of strain-specific biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) indicate adaptive evolution.

conclusionsThe overall comparative genomic insights into P. chlororaphis strains FS-2 and RP-4 indicate their metabolic and plant-beneficial characteristics for rhizosphere competence and their use as biological control agents.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialGenomicsPlant DevelopmentPseudomonas chlororaphisSoil MicrobiologyMultigene FamilyPhylogenyPyrrolnitrinPyrrolnitrinbiosynthetic gene clusterscomparative genomicsPseudomonas aurantiacaPseudomonas chlororaphissecondary metabolites

Identifiers

PMID41792602
PMCPMC13077833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.