Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41792597›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2026

The effect of hyper-induced SOS response on evolution in Escherichia coli.

Ruoxuan Zhao, Lars Jelsbak, Yufei Zhao, John Elmerdahl Olsen, Line Elnif Thomsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruoxuan ZhaoDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars JelsbakDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Yufei ZhaoDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
John Elmerdahl OlsenDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Line Elnif ThomsenDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. leth@sund.ku.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe SOS response, a conserved bacterial DNA repair system, plays a critical role in adaptation under stress, by inducing spontaneous mutations. This study compared the evolutionary dynamics of Escherichia coli and a derivative of this strain with a constitutively activated SOS response (SOS*), focusing on growth phenotype, competitive fitness, genome evolution, and metabolism over 90 days of evolution.

resultsLaboratory evolution revealed that both wild-type and SOS* populations increased in growth rates, reduced average cell lengths, improved competitive fitness, and expanded their catabolic substrate utilization over time. However, SOS* strains, which revealed initial reduced growth rate, fitness and carbon-utilization, adapted at a faster rate than the wild-type, and obtained levels comparable to the wild-type. Whole-genome sequencing identified higher mutation rates and distinct mutation patterns in the SOS* populations compared to the wild-type populations, particularly an increase in non-synonymous substitutions, suggesting positive selection for adaptive traits. Mutational analyses revealed convergence in regulatory and metabolic pathways in both wild-type and SOS* groups. However, SOS* accumulated a higher number of mutations in regulatory and metabolic genes, consistent with increased phenotypic flexibility during adaptation. Despite this, their fitness and carbon source utilization abilities did not surpass those of the evolved wild-types.

conclusionOur results indicate that while SOS-mediated mutagenesis enhances genetic diversity and accelerates adaptation, its long-term impact on adaptive evolution may be limited under non-selective environments due to the sustained SOS activation.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliEvolution, MolecularSOS Response, GeneticsAdaptation, PhysiologicalEscherichia coli ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenetic FitnessGenome, BacterialMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMutationMutation RatePhenotypeWhole Genome SequencingEscherichia coli ProteinsAdaptive evolutionMetabolic regulationSOS mutagenesisSOS response

Identifiers

PMID41792597
PMCPMC13081320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.