ArticleBMC microbiology2026
The effect of hyper-induced SOS response on evolution in Escherichia coli.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe SOS response, a conserved bacterial DNA repair system, plays a critical role in adaptation under stress, by inducing spontaneous mutations. This study compared the evolutionary dynamics of Escherichia coli and a derivative of this strain with a constitutively activated SOS response (SOS*), focusing on growth phenotype, competitive fitness, genome evolution, and metabolism over 90 days of evolution.
resultsLaboratory evolution revealed that both wild-type and SOS* populations increased in growth rates, reduced average cell lengths, improved competitive fitness, and expanded their catabolic substrate utilization over time. However, SOS* strains, which revealed initial reduced growth rate, fitness and carbon-utilization, adapted at a faster rate than the wild-type, and obtained levels comparable to the wild-type. Whole-genome sequencing identified higher mutation rates and distinct mutation patterns in the SOS* populations compared to the wild-type populations, particularly an increase in non-synonymous substitutions, suggesting positive selection for adaptive traits. Mutational analyses revealed convergence in regulatory and metabolic pathways in both wild-type and SOS* groups. However, SOS* accumulated a higher number of mutations in regulatory and metabolic genes, consistent with increased phenotypic flexibility during adaptation. Despite this, their fitness and carbon source utilization abilities did not surpass those of the evolved wild-types.
conclusionOur results indicate that while SOS-mediated mutagenesis enhances genetic diversity and accelerates adaptation, its long-term impact on adaptive evolution may be limited under non-selective environments due to the sustained SOS activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.