ArticleThe Journal of eukaryotic microbiology
Cool and Shady: Ecophysiological Preferences of Chrysophytes.
Article in The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chrysophyceae (Stramenopiles) are a diverse group of protists widely distributed in various aquatic habitats, including alpine lakes, where they play key ecological roles. Their nutritional modes-phototrophy, heterotrophy, and mixotrophy-enable them to adapt to the unique light and temperature conditions found across altitudinal gradients in mountain environments. This study investigates the growth responses of three mixotrophic and three phototrophic chrysophyte strains, isolated from alpine and pre-alpine lakes, to varying light intensities and temperatures. Our results show that both temperature and light intensity exert strong, species-specific effects on the growth of phototrophic and mixotrophic Chrysophyceae. Despite their contrasting original habitats, most strains shared similar growth optima, with peak performance generally observed between 15°C and 19°C and reduced growth at both lower and higher temperatures. All strains exhibited negative growth in darkness, confirming their phototrophic dependence. Growth rates typically increased with light availability up to a species-specific optimum (12-35 μE m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.