ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Assessing Measurement Repeatability of a Novel Anisotropic Phantom for Advanced Diffusion MRI Models.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDiffusion MRI is widely used to characterize tissue microstructure, but standardization remains challenging, particularly for advanced models or regions with crossing fibers. Phantoms provide controlled environments to assess measurement repeatability independent of biological variability. This study evaluated the repeatability of higher-order diffusion tensor metrics using a novel anisotropic diffusion phantom designed to mimic white matter tract geometry.
methodsThe phantom, containing linear, crossing (30°, 45°, 90°), and bifurcating synthetic fiber bundles, was scanned seven times using a GE Healthcare 3.0 T MRI system. Four acquisition protocols were evaluated: 30-direction DTI (b = 1000s/mm
resultsDTI-derived metrics demonstrated excellent repeatability, with fractional anisotropy (FA) CoV < 10% and mean, axial, and radial diffusivities < 3%. DKI-derived metrics exhibited greater variability, though kurtosis FA remained stable (CoV ∼7%). Generalized FA showed improved reliability with increased angular resolution (ICC = 0.8445 for 90-direction HARDI). fODFs accurately resolved crossing fibers at 90° (RMSE = 3.49°) and 45° (RMSE = 8.92°) but failed at 30° separation.
conclusionThe phantom provides reliable repeatability for standard DTI metrics and demonstrates utility for quality assurance of advanced diffusion models with high angular resolution protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.