Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41792576›Full record

ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026

Comparing Implicit and Self-Report Measures of Skin Color in African Context.

Oyenike Balogun, Zoe S Hong, Clifton M Chow

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oyenike BalogunBentley University, Waltham, MA, USA. obalogun@bentley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4548-8762
Zoe S HongTufts University, Medford, MA, United States.
Clifton M ChowBentley University, Waltham, MA, USA.

Funding

Bentley University Bentley University Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body image researchers, who are focused on Africa, have largely depended on measures adapted from European and/or American studies, which may inadequately capture the experiences of Black African women. Moreover, these measures are overwhelmingly focused on self-report. Given the high rates of harmful skin modification practices across the continent (e.g., skin bleaching), there is a need for more sensitive, culturally responsive measurements. We examine whether and how an implicit measure of skin color preference may uniquely assess skin color preferences among Black African women. To this end, Black African women, primarily from South Africa (N = 221), were recruited online and responded to a survey, which included measures of skin color satisfaction and the Skin Implicit Association Test (Skin IAT). Findings revealed that the implicit measure identified more Black African women with lighter skin tone preferences than identified by the self-report measures. Participants uniquely identified by the implicit measure were relatively younger and higher educated, but this finding was not statistically significant. Notably, we found support for divergence between self-report and implicit measures, suggesting that they assess distinct constructs. Implications for future research in African contexts are discussed.

Indexed as

Black African WomenBody imageCulturally responsive measuresCultural psychologyImplicit association testSkin tone satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID41792576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.