Observational studyNeurocritical care2026
Utilization of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents in Acute Brain Injury and Associations with Outcomes: A Post Hoc Analysis of the ENIO Study.
Observational study in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03400904 (Gestion du Sevrage de la Ventilation mécanique du Patient neurolésé en réanimation et Association Avec le Devenir. Etude Observationnelle Multi-centrique Internationale. Extubation Strategies in Neuro-Intensive Care Unit Patients and Associations With Outcome. The International Observational ENIO Study.), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Gestion du Sevrage de la Ventilation mécanique du Patient neurolésé en réanimation et Association Avec le Devenir. Etude Observationnelle Multi-centrique Internationale. Extubation Strategies in Neuro-Intensive Care Unit Patients and Associations With Outcome. The International Observational ENIO Study.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Balancing lung and brain: physiological strategies for ARDS management in acute brain injury.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) have been used in mechanically ventilated patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in cases of clinically significant ventilator dyssynchrony, and in patients with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). However, practice patterns around NMBA utilization and their impact on outcomes in acute brain injury (ABI) remain insufficiently explored.
methodsThis study carried out a post hoc analysis of a multicenter, prospective observational study (NCT03400904) including adult patients with ABI (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 12 before intubation) who required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) ≥ 24 h. Patients who received NMBA during their first week of ICU stay were propensity matched to those who did not.
resultsPropensity score matching was performed in 1482 patients; among the matched cohort (n = 258), 33.3% (n = 86) received NMBA. NMBA utilization varied from 0% to 59.3% across countries. Multivariable regressions demonstrated associations between NMBA use and utilization of intraparenchymal ICP monitoring (odds ratio, OR 2.06; 95% confidence interval, CI 1.16-3.76), extraventricular drain placement (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.18-4.05), higher PaCO
conclusionsNMBA utilization varied widely, highlighting the need for more evidence to guide clinical practice. NMBA were most commonly used in patients with ICP monitoring or moderate-to-severe ARDS; associations with outcomes warrant further exploration in randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41792523What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.