Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41792485›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Is there Any Correlation Between Nasal Height and Facial-Nasal Horizontal Anthropometrics? An Anthropometric Analysis Using Three-Dimensional CT.

Alperen Can Kokten, Umut Tuncel, Ayhan Sonmez, Mehmet Kadir Atdagi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alperen Can KoktenDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical Faculty, Samsun University, 55100, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0007-5943-3985
Umut TuncelDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical Faculty, Samsun University, 55100, Samsun, Turkey. drumuttuncel@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5029-2927
Ayhan SonmezDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical Faculty, Samsun University, 55100, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4642-3274
Mehmet Kadir AtdagiDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical Faculty, Samsun University, 55100, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0004-2016-2637

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relationship between horizontal nasal and facial anthropometric measurements and nasal height remains unaddressed, and normative data specific to the Turkish population are currently limited in the existing literature. MATERIALS AND

methodsA review of nasal bone anthropometrics was conducted using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) images from 249 randomly selected adult Turkish patients who applied for rhinoplasty in 2025. In this cross-sectional study, high-resolution CT scans were reconstructed into three-dimensional views employing standardized imaging parameters. The mean bizygomatic distance (K), the widest length of nasal aperture (L), the narrowest length of the nasal aperture (M), the width at nasion level (N), and the nasal height (O), also key anthropometric ratios (K/O, L/O, M/O, N/O), were calculated and compared across sex and nasal bony shape groups (S vs V-shaped). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to establish discriminatory thresholds, with particular emphasis on nasal height.

resultsOf the cases, 141 were male, and 108 were female. A total of 178 patients had an S-shaped configuration, while 71 patients had a V-shaped configuration. Male patients had significantly higher nasal bone ratios than females (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between S- and V-shaped morphologies. All horizontal measurements were positively correlated with nasal height. ROC analysis identified nasal height as a moderate discriminator, with a threshold of 1.65 cm. The main finding was that the K/O ratio was the most potent determinant for planning nasal height. Additionally, a formula was developed to estimate the ideal dorsal projection, assessing nasal height and its proportion relative to overall facial width.

conclusionsThe study's results indicate that as horizontal dimensions increase, nasal height also increases, a phenomenon that is more pronounced in men. Additionally, the most critical determinants were the bizygomatic width and the widest nasal aperture length, which can be used to estimate the desired nasal height for surgical planning in rhinoplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

FaceImaging, Three-DimensionalNasal BoneNoseRhinoplastyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAdultAnthropometryCephalometryCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReference ValuesFacial anthropometricsNasal anthropometricsNasal heightRhinoplasty

Identifiers

PMID41792485
PMCPMC13183685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.