Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41792451›Full record

ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026

Rapid growth and thematic shifts in mRNA therapeutics research catalyzed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Prabakaran Annadurai

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Prabakaran AnnaduraiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy and Technology Management, SVKM's Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies (NMIMS), Deemed-to-be University, Jadcherla, Hyderabad, 509301, India. prabakaran.a@nmims.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3760-1614

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Messenger RNA (mRNA) therapeutics emerged as a clinically validated therapeutic approach during the COVID-19 pandemic. Unlike conventional small-molecule drugs or biologics, mRNA therapeutics exert their pharmacological effects indirectly by modulating intracellular protein expression and the immune system. However, the clinical demands that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic rapidly accelerated mRNA therapeutics research and its clinical translation. Therefore, the present study examines how the COVID-19 pandemic reshaped global mRNA therapeutics research by comparing the pre-pandemic (2015-2019) and pandemic/post-pandemic (2020-2025) periods. A systematic analysis of peer-reviewed literature indexed in the Scopus database was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The research activity increased markedly, with a nearly 13-fold rise in publications on mRNA therapeutics after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, the analysis revealed a shift from oncology-oriented studies to vaccine-focused therapeutic research. The foundational studies on nucleoside-modified mRNA and lipid-based delivery systems aligned with large-scale clinical trial evidence. These trials validated the technology by demonstrating reproducible efficacy and acceptable safety profiles. Further, the collaboration patterns evolved from a predominantly US-centered structure to a globally interconnected research network led by the USA, China, and Germany. Overall, these findings provide quantitative evidence of significant shifts in global mRNA research activity and direction during the COVID-19 period.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentRNA, MessengerAnimalsHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2RNA, MessengerCOVID-19Lipid nanoparticlesmRNAResearch trendsScientometric analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.