Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41792425›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2026

Inhibitory control training and unhealthy behaviours: a meta-analysis testing short and long- term effects in clinical and at-risk populations.

Elisa Di Rosa, Lucia Ronconi, Beatrice Del Carlo, Giulia Giordano, Eleonora Macchia, Valentina Cardi, Claudio Gentili, Fabio Masina, Claudia Guarrera, Daniela Mapelli and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elisa Di RosaDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, Padova, 35131, Italy. elisa.dirosa@unipd.it.
Lucia RonconiStatistical Services, Multifunctional Pole of Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Beatrice Del CarloDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, Padova, 35131, Italy.
Giulia GiordanoDepartment of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Eleonora MacchiaNational Research Council, Padova, Italy.
Valentina CardiDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, Padova, 35131, Italy.
Claudio GentiliDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, Padova, 35131, Italy.
Fabio MasinaDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, Padova, 35131, Italy.
Claudia GuarreraDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, Padova, 35131, Italy.
Daniela MapelliDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, Padova, 35131, Italy.
Nicky EdelstynDepartment of Psychology, The University of Bath, BA2 7AY, Bath, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The consumption of tobacco, alcohol, and unhealthy foods is considered the three key factors contributing to preventable morbidity and early mortality worldwide. Inhibitory Control Training (ICT) is suggested as an intervention to reduce behaviours linked to deficient inhibitory control. However, evidence supporting its efficacy on clinical and at-risk populations is lacking. Here, we provide new meta-analytic evidence about the efficacy of ICT in reducing overeating, alcohol consumption, and cigarette smoking in clinical and at-risk populations. Our meta-analysis encompassed fifteen articles, comprising sixteen studies and data from one thousand two hundred and sixteen participants. Nine studies focused on eating behaviour, four on alcohol consumption, and three on cigarette smoking, and they focused on the following clinical and at-risk conditions: overweight, obesity and eating disorders; alcohol use disorder and heavy drinking habits; tobacco use disorders or nicotine dependence. In all the studies, ICT was employed as a stand-alone intervention. We performed meta-analyses to evaluate the effects of ICT on behavioural outcomes at post-training (short-term) and at follow-up (long-term), and meta-regressions to test the role of the following moderators: target behaviour; training paradigm, setting; training duration; and number of sessions. Results indicated no significant differences between the experimental and control conditions, both in the short and long-term. Furthermore, none of the considered moderators had a significant influence on ICT effects. These results suggest caution in the use of ICT as a stand-alone psychological intervention for excessive alcohol and food consumption, and cigarette smoking in clinical and at-risk populations, and suggest further investigation on the effectiveness of ICT when delivered alongside other treatments.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingInhibition, PsychologicalAlcoholismFeeding and Eating DisordersFeeding BehaviorHumansObesityTobacco Use DisorderAlcoholInhibitory control trainingOvereatingSmokingUnhealthy behaviour

Identifiers

PMID41792425
PMCPMC13133358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.