ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
RoentMod: a synthetic chest X-ray modification model to identify and correct image interpretation model shortcuts.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Detectability and healthcare implications of generative AI-synthesized chest radiographs: a blinded radiologist reader study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chest radiographs (CXRs) are among the most common tests in medicine; automated interpretation may reduce radiologists' workload and expand access. Deep learning multi-task and foundation models have shown strong CXR interpretation performance but are vulnerable to shortcut learning, where spurious correlations drive decision-making. We introduce RoentMod, a counterfactual image editing framework that generates realistic CXRs with user-specified and synthetic pathology while maintaining the original anatomical features. RoentMod combines an open-source medical image generator (RoentGen) with an image-to-image modification model without retraining. In reader studies of RoentMod-produced images, 93% appeared realistic, 89-99% correctly incorporated the specified finding, and all preserved native anatomy comparable to real follow-up CXRs. Using RoentMod, we demonstrate that state-of-the-art multi-task and foundation models frequently exploit off-target pathology as shortcuts, limiting their specificity. Incorporating RoentMod-generated counterfactual images during training mitigated this vulnerability, improving model discrimination across multiple pathologies by 3-19% AUC in internal validation and by 1-11% for 5 out of 6 tested pathologies in external testing. These findings establish RoentMod as a tool to probe and correct shortcut learning in medical AI. By enabling controlled counterfactual interventions, RoentMod enhances the robustness and interpretability of CXR interpretation models and provides a strategy to improve medical imaging models.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.