Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41792376›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Improving non-expert performance in musculoskeletal MRI protocoling through a large language model.

Sungwon Lee, Hyeondeok Choi, Keum San Chun, Seungeun Lee, Hyemin Park, Tuan Dinh Le, Pritam Mukherjee, Jungwoo Lee, Soy Chang, So-Yeon Lee and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sungwon LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
Hyeondeok ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
Keum San ChunVisual Analysis and Learning for Improved Diagnostics (VALID) lab, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
Seungeun LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
Hyemin ParkDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
Tuan Dinh LeVisual Analysis and Learning for Improved Diagnostics (VALID) lab, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
Pritam MukherjeeImaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Laboratory, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Building 10, Room 1C224D, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1182, USA.
Jungwoo LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
Soy ChangDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
So-Yeon LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
Joon-Yong JungDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea. jy.jung@songeui.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MRI protocoling, the process of selecting appropriate sequences, is especially complex in musculoskeletal (MSK) cases. This study evaluates whether a large language model (LLM) can effectively assist non-experts in MRI protocoling. We collected two retrospective datasets of musculoskeletal (MSK) MRI orders: (1) a prompt-development dataset (Jan–Dec 2023; 538 cases) and (2) a testing dataset (Jan–Jun 2024; 107 cases). A prompt was refined on GPT-4o via the web-based ChatGPT interface to use patient information and complete an MRI protocol worksheet. For the testing dataset, 6 non-experts (three radiology residents [RD] and three radiographers [RG]) completed the worksheet with and without LLM-assistance. All worksheets were scored using a clinical pass system, categorizing responses as “excellent (4 points),” “acceptable (3 points),” “insufficient (2 points),” or “failure (1 point)” based on potential outcomes. We compared clinical pass scores between LLM-assisted and human-only worksheets using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and a mixed linear model. Fleiss’ kappa across five iterations was measured for stochasticity. LLM-assisted worksheets had higher average clinical pass scores than human-only worksheets for both RD (3.42 vs. 3.18, p < 0.001) and RG (3.06 vs. 2.9, p < 0.001). LLM-assistance decreased the proportion of “insufficient” and “failure” cases, potentially decreasing MRI re-checks, with an average reduction of 12.2% (13 out of 107) for RD and 8% (8.7 out of 107) for RG. This improvement was consistent across professions (p = 0.43). LLM outputs showed strong reliability across five iterations (κ = 0.66). LLM-assistance improves the performance of non-experts in MSK MRI protocoling and has the potential to reduce repeat scans.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMusculoskeletal SystemHumansLarge Language ModelsRetrospective StudiesGPT-4oLarge language modelMusculoskeletal MRINon-expert performanceProtocol

Identifiers

PMID41792376
PMCPMC13083949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.