Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41792369›Full record

ArticleMolecular biomedicine2026

Interaction between transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 and glutamate NMDA receptor subunit 1 mediates endoplasmic reticulum stress and neuroinflammation in postoperative delirium.

Shiqian Huang, Tianhao Zhang, Yu Wang, Hongying Du, Jingang He, Hongchun Zeng, Lulin Ma, Daling Deng, Yuxi Zhou, Shiya Liu and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Shiqian Huang *Department of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, P. R. China.
Tianhao Zhang *Department of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, P. R. China.
Yu Wang *Department of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, P. R. China.
Hongying DuCollege of Light Industry and Food Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210037, P. R. China.
Jingang HeUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.
Hongchun ZengDepartment of Utrasonography, Songjiang Research Institute, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Emotions and Affective Disorders (LEAD), Songjiang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Lulin MaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, P. R. China.
Daling DengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, P. R. China.
Yuxi ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, P. R. China.
Shiya LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, P. R. China.
Wenjing ZhaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, P. R. China.
Xinxin YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, P. R. China.
Linlin HanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, P. R. China.
Shuai ZhaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, East Lake Road, Wuhan, 430071, P. R. China.
Shaofang ShuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, P. R. China.
Shanglong YaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, P. R. China.
Qi ZhongKey Laboratory of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Ministry of Education, Wuhan, 430022, P. R. China. 200732180224@whu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6470-2590
Xiangdong ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, P. R. China. xiangdongchen2013@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3347-2947
Jie WangDepartment of Utrasonography, Songjiang Research Institute, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Emotions and Affective Disorders (LEAD), Songjiang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, P. R. China. jie.wang@shsmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1365-1408

Funding

Biosecurity Research Project 23SWAQ24National Natural Science Foundation of China 32271148National Natural Science Foundation of China 82201350National Natural Science Foundation of China 82401847National Natural Science Foundation of China 82471251National Natural Science Foundation of China 82471504Research Grant of Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Ministry of Education 2024MZFS002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a serious and prevalent neurocognitive complication that poses a major clinical challenge because its mechanism is unclear. This study identifies a pathogenic pathway centred on the direct interaction between transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) and the essential N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) subunit GluN1. Using a murine POD model, the neuron-centric glutamatergic dysfunction in the hippocampus was initially confirmed through ex vivo metabolic kinetic analysis. Transcriptomic analysis revealed upregulation of Trpv4, predominantly in neurons. Co-immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry revealed that TRPV4 directly interacts with GluN1. This enhanced TRPV4-GluN1 coupling promoted GluN1 phosphorylation at serine 896 and hyperactivated NMDAR signalling. We subsequently observed the concurrent induction of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, as evidenced by a dilated ER ultrastructure and the upregulation of the expression of UPR markers (ATF6, p-PERK, p-IRE1α, and CHOP), as well as neuroinflammation, characterized by microglial activation and elevated expression of proinflammatory mediators (IL-6, IL-1β, and ICAM-1). These molecular pathologies were associated with decreased neuronal activity and the characteristic cognitive-affective deficits associated with POD. Critically, both pharmacological inhibition of TRPV4 (HC067047) and hippocampal CA3-specific Trpv4 knockdown reversed these pathologies and rescued the behaviour. Inhibiting NMDAR with MK801 recapitulated these therapeutic benefits. Furthermore, TRPV4 was significantly upregulated in early-onset Alzheimer's disease patients. Our study defines a novel TRPV4-GluN1 axis that drives POD pathogenesis, suggesting that it is a promising therapeutic target.

Indexed as

DeliriumEndoplasmic Reticulum StressNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuroinflammatory DiseasesPostoperative ComplicationsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateTRPV Cation ChannelsAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHippocampusHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsSignal TransductionGprin1 protein, mouseNerve Tissue ProteinsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateTRPV Cation ChannelsEndoplasmic reticulum stressGluN1NeuroinflammationPostoperative deliriumTRPV4

Identifiers

PMID41792369
PMCPMC12965926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.