ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and validation of a machine learning model for individualised meropenem dosing in CRRT patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Intelligent Operating Room to Smart ICU: Digital Continuity, AI-Supported Decision-Making and CRRT as a Model of Pharmacokinetic Personalization in Critical Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prediction of Meropenem Target Attainment in Critically Ill Patients Using Routine Clinical Data from a Single Center: A Machine Learning Approach.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimizing meropenem dosing in critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) remains challenging due to significant pharmacokinetic variability. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML)-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) for individualizing meropenem dosing in this population. A large-scale virtual cohort (n = 48,000) was generated using a published population pharmacokinetic (POPPK) model to simulate diverse dosing regimens. Various ML models were trained to predict the probability of achieving two stringent pharmacodynamic (PD) targets: 100% fT>MIC and 100% fT>4×MIC. Feature importance was interpreted using SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) analysis. External validation was conducted using clinical CRRT patient data, and predictive performance was compared with that of the traditional POPPK model. The top-performing model was deployed into a Streamlit-based web CDSS, named "MerDose" for clinical use. The ML models exhibited excellent predictive performance on the simulated test set, with accuracy and F1 scores predominantly above 0.95. Notably, in the external validation cohort, the Gradient Boosting (GB) model robustly outperformed the conventional POPPK model across stringent pharmacodynamic targets (100% fT>MIC and 100% fT>4×MIC), achieving AUC values of 0.884 and 0.929, respectively, versus 0.823 and 0.871 for the POPPK model. Interpretation via SHAP analysis confirmed that the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), dosing interval, dose amount, CRRT clearance (CL
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.