ArticleScientific reports2026
Objective assessment of familiarity in music using imagery and EEG-based machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Musical memory engages perceptual, mnemonic, and predictive processes that enable listeners to recognize and internally continue familiar melodies. When expected musical events are briefly omitted, these predictive mechanisms often trigger spontaneous musical imagery, providing a robust paradigm for examining the neural dynamics of familiarity in healthy individuals. In this study, we introduce a passive EEG-based machine-learning approach to evaluate musical familiarity using imagery. Twenty participants listened to familiar and unfamiliar songs embedded with brief silent gaps designed to elicit spontaneous musical imagery. EEG signals recorded during these silences were analyzed using both spectral features and Riemannian geometry-based tangent space mapping (TSM). Machine learning classifiers were trained independently for each subject to distinguish neural responses associated with familiar versus unfamiliar music. Our results show that models using TSM features outperformed those based on conventional spectral features, with logistic regression achieving the highest accuracy (76.5% ± 8.0%). Analysis of feature importance revealed that discriminative signals predominantly originated from auditory cortices, particularly in the right hemisphere, and reflected both local activity and functional connectivity. These findings demonstrate that machine learning approaches capture subtle, subject-specific neural patterns associated with musical imagery and memory retrieval. Replication in larger and more diverse populations will be necessary to establish the robustness and generalizability of the approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.