ArticleScientific reports2026
A hybrid machine learning approach for reliably predicting surface roughness in CNC turning operations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surface roughness in CNC turning is a pivotal quality metric shaping functional performance, service life and production cost. This study investigates data-driven prediction of arithmetic mean surface roughness (Ra) during the turning of AISI H13 steel under both new-tool and progressively worn-tool conditions. Several machine learning models including k-Nearest neighbors (KNN), random forest (RF) and extra trees (ExT) are evaluated and compared with a stacking ensemble model that integrates these base learners using a linear regression meta-learner. The input variables consist of cutting speed, feed rate, depth of cut and triaxial cutting force components. The results show that the KNN model exhibits limited predictive accuracy whereas the RF and ExT models achieve competitive performance. The proposed stacking ensemble consistently outperforms all individual models achieving a coefficient of determination (R²) exceeding 0.98 along with substantial reductions in root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) under tool-wear conditions indicating strong generalization capability. To enhance model transparency SHapley additive exPlanations (SHAP) and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) are employed. The interpretability analyses identify feed rate as the dominant factor influencing surface roughness while the importance of cutting forces and the interaction between depth of cut and feed rate increases as tool wear progresses. Overall the findings demonstrate that the proposed stacking-based hybrid model provides an accurate, robust and explainable framework for surface roughness prediction in CNC turning offering practical potential for in-process quality monitoring and decision support applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.