ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2026
Evolution of the ilizarov technique: A scoping review of improvement.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe Ilizarov technique is a cornerstone of orthopedic reconstruction, yet it faces persistent challenges such as prolonged external fixation and patient discomfort. This scoping review aims to synthesize recent advancements in the Ilizarov method, focusing on innovations in fixation devices, osteotomy techniques, bone transport protocols, and multimodal integrations.
methodsA literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE from inception to November 2024. Studies reporting innovations in device design, surgical technique, or adjunctive therapies related to the Ilizarov method were included. Key findings were synthesized narratively across four predefined domains.
resultsRecent improvements include: (1) lighter and smarter external fixators (e.g., hexapod systems, computer-aided design); (2) refined osteotomies (e.g., low-energy, bifocal/trifocal strategies) to preserve biology and reduce treatment time; (3) optimized transport protocols (e.g., acute shortening, cable-pulley systems); and (4) multimodal integration with technologies such as 3D printing, internal fixation, induced membrane technique, and biologics (e.g., BMSCs, growth factors), which have shown potential to enhance bone regeneration and reduce complications.
conclusionThe Ilizarov technique continues to evolve through device innovation, biological refinement, and technological integration. These advancements enhance its efficacy and patient outcomes, paving the way for broader clinical applications and further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.