Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41792306›Full record

ReviewAdvances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology2026

Quantitative Perspectives of Biomolecular Crystallization Thermodynamics.

Marc Pusey

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marc PuseyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USA. mlp0041@uah.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The driving force for solution crystallization is the supersaturation, the concentration of the crystallizing species in solution over the concentration when the solution is at equilibrium with the solid phase. It is observed that macromolecule crystals typically nucleate and grow at higher supersaturations than found for small molecules. The equilibrium concentration at a defined set of conditions is a fixed point in the phase diagram and as such can be thermodynamically evaluated. The problems of working with biomolecules, such as their usually limited supply, structural flexibility, and limited stability in solution, exacerbate the problems of obtaining solubility data. This chapter, presented in four sections, focuses on proteins. Section 1 is a general review of protein crystallization and the importance of solubility in crystallization studies. Section 2 is a review of the methods that have been developed for determining protein solubility. These can be broadly differentiated into solution-based and optical approaches. As a general rule, the optimal methods for determining solubility are those that approach it from both directions, from over- and undersaturated conditions. Section 3 covers solubility data analysis and the parameters that are derived from this analysis. Section 4 reviews another commonly derived parameter, the second virial coefficient, B

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalProteinsThermodynamicsCrystallizationSolubilityProteinsEquilibriumMethodsPhase diagramSecond virial coefficientSolubility

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.