ArticleActa neurochirurgica2026
Microscopic transorbital vs mini-pterional approach to MCA bifurcation aneurysms: a quantitative cadaveric comparative study with surgical implications.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe mini-pterional (MP) approach is widely adopted as the standard exposure for middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms, whereas the eyelid transorbital (TOA) approach has recently emerged as a minimally invasive alternative. This cadaveric study aims to quantitatively compare the anatomical exposure and working geometry of the mini-pterional and microscopic transorbital approaches to the MCA bifurcation, with implications for approach selection and skull base microsurgical planning.
methodsFive latex-injected human cadaveric heads were dissected via either the MP (n = 5) or TOA (n = 5) approach. Standardized microsurgical techniques of eyelid transorbital and mini-pterional approaches were used to access the MCA bifurcation. Key surgical parameters including access depth, access angle (M1 angle) to first segment of MCA (M1), and horizontal and vertical angles of attack to the MCA bifurcation were evaluated quantitatively using neuronavigation. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test with a significance threshold of p < 0.05.
resultsBoth approaches provided adequate exposure to the MCA bifurcation and its branches. The working distance is similar in both approaches (MP 26.9 ± 7.48 mm vs. TOA 31.0 ± 7.49 mm, p = 0.24). The MP approach offered significantly wider vertical angle of attack (86.1 ± 34.82° vs. 45.3 ± 32.11°, p = 0.02) while the horizontal angle (25.0 ± 8.56° vs. 33.6 ± 15.33°, p = 0.42) was comparable in both approaches. The TOA approach demonstrates a more perpendicular M1 angle (54.3 ± 17.37° vs. 32.7 ± 17.2°, p = 0.03), which may be anatomically favorable for proximal control.
conclusionThe MP approach remains advantageous for broader exposure and maneuverability; however, the microscopic TOA offers distinct anatomical exposure characteristics. These findings define the geometric differences between the two routes and may inform surgical planning in selected MCA bifurcation aneurysm cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.