Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41792287›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

The role of future planning, patience, and risk tolerance for prospective reciprocity in human adults.

Stefanie Keupp, Sebastian Grüneisen, Sebastian Olschewski, Maria Victoria Hernández-Lloreda, Felix Warneken, Elliot A Ludvig, Alicia P Melis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefanie KeuppDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University College London, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3EL, UK.
Sebastian GrüneisenDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, 500 S State St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Sebastian OlschewskiDepartment of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Maria Victoria Hernández-LloredaDepartment of Psychobiology and Methodology in Behavioral Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Barcelona, Spain.
Felix WarnekenDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, 500 S State St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Elliot A LudvigDepartment of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, England.
Alicia P MelisDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University College London, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3EL, UK. a.melis@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/R008353/2Horizon 2020 794545National Science Foundation 1901661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study aimed to test a suite of psychological proximate mechanisms thought to underlie prospective reciprocity - engaging in cooperative acts with the anticipation that benefits will be returned in the future. We developed and validated a novel online test battery with 297 participants to assess individual differences in three domains (planning, patience, risk tolerance) and their relation to participants' responses across different prospective reciprocity tasks. Tasks assessing patience showed high internal consistency and were positively associated with cooperative behaviour across all three prospective reciprocity tasks. The pattern was less clear for risk, with associations varying across tasks, and planning ability was negatively correlated with one prospective reciprocity task. Across the prospective reciprocity tasks, performance showed limited convergence, indicating that forward-looking cooperative behavior is context dependent rather than reflecting a unitary, domain-general tendency. Taken together, our results show that planning, patience, and risk tolerance each contribute to forward-looking cooperation in task-specific ways, underscoring the need for improved psychometric approaches.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorAdultFemaleHumansIndividualityInterpersonal RelationsMalePsychometricsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41792287
PMCPMC13083854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.