ArticleScientific reports2026
Restoring productivity of degraded mined soils using legume leaf residues as organic amendments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scarcity and cost of topsoil and conventional materials make legume residues a promising alternative for reclaiming land degraded by opencast mining. This study examined plant residues by evaluating the effect of their quality (C:N ratio, lignin, polyphenols) on soil organic carbon (SOC), total soil nitrogen (TN) and crop (maize, cowpea) performance. A 12-month pot experimentation in Kumasi (Ghana) tested leafy residues of Leucaena leucocephala, Gliricidia sepium, Mucuna pruriens, Pueraria phaseoloides, and Panicum maximum (control), applied at four rates (0, 10, 20, 30 t ha⁻¹ dry weight) using a factorial randomized complete block design with four replications. Legumes had higher N content (≈ 3.5% by Leucaena) and higher quality indices (highest PRQI of 4.7 by Gliricidia), but lower lignin content than Panicum. SOC and TN gains were high (≈ 500% SOC and > 800% TN gains by Mucuna and Leucaena, respectively), explained by low initial concentrations of the substrate. Although mineralization was slow, plant quality indicators correlated with SOC and TN. Maize, other than cowpea, responded well to residues, with Leucaena (30 t ha⁻¹) yielding the highest dry matter (≈ 4.2 t ha⁻¹). Legume residues provide a sustainable solution for reclaiming opencast-mined land, showing subsoil improvement potential that requires field trials to validate pot-scale findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.