ArticleScientific reports2026
A joint modeling framework for time-to-fatigue prediction with a single wearable sensor biomarker.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physical fatigue is a prevalent issue in the U.S. workforce and has resulted in reduced productivity and a higher incidence of workplace accidents. Being able to estimate time to fatigue facilitates proactive interventions before fatigue onset. Existing research has primarily focused on the fatigue state, intensity, and wearable sensor characteristics while there remains a gap in predicting time to fatigue and identifying indicative biomarkers that can dynamically signal impending fatigue risks. In this study, we utilize simulated manufacturing work tasks and employ a joint modeling framework that links a longitudinal biomarker to predict individual time-to-fatigue outcomes. Across two case studies with differing task demands and durations, the joint model with a single sensor trajectory consistently outperformed baseline methods, including Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models, demonstrating its effectiveness for dynamic fatigue prediction in simulated manufacturing tasks while accounting for variations across tasks and individual sensor responses. Although predictive features may vary by task, our results suggest that, within the contexts examined, jerk-based features–identified in previous studies, including our own, as indicators of fatigue states–may also serve as predictors of time to fatigue. These findings advance the understanding of fatigue progression and offer foundational insights for supporting timely interventions in future applied settings. This work highlights the potential of online wearable monitoring and interpretable statistical methods to inform proactive occupational safety strategies and worker well-being initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.