ArticleScientific reports2026
Promoting structural sustainable design through the influence of quality control assessments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multi-stage coupling analysis and design optimization method for quality characteristics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In structural reliability assessments, the selection of suitable parameters for the definition of stochastic models of component properties—such as concrete compressive strength, steel yield strength or geometric dimensions—is a prime requirement. Typically, during the production of structural components, several conformity control criteria, which are part of quality control assessments, are adopted to evaluate whether their properties comply with specified requirements. Previous investigations have demonstrated that the consideration of conformity control assessments in reliability studies might have a positive influence on the structural reliability of a component, thereby, enabling more material and resource efficient designs than conventional designs that do not take conformity control into account. In this investigation, a methodology grounded on the principles of reliability theory and Bayesian statistics is offered to quantify the positive effects of conformity control assessments in structural reliability levels. The practical application of this methodology is further demonstrated through an example extracted from previous investigations concerning the reliability level of a short concrete column subjected to compression. The results suggest that existing safety margins can be activated to adjust partial safety factors on the resistance side and, thus, optimise design solutions. Finally, possible improvements for the overall methodology are identified, opening avenues for the design of more sustainable structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.