ArticleScientific reports2026
Electrical information flows across the sporocarps of two ectomycorrhizal fungi in the field.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Propagation of electrical spike trains in substrates colonised by oyster fungi.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Fungal Frontiers in (Bio)sensing.Biosensors · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrical signal transfer across fungal mycelia in forest floor is a fascinating idea in ecology but not fully explored yet. We measured the extracellular bioelectrical activities of two ectomycorrhizal basidiomycete species belonging to the genus Hebeloma in a field to examine the potential information flow across the sporocarps and its reponse to artificial stimulation. The 37 sporocarps (29 H. danicum and 8 H. cylindrosporum) occurring within a 5 m × 5 m quadrat on the forest floor of an oak-dominated stand were measured for their electrical potential every second for 3.5 days using subdermal stainless electrodes. Causality analysis of electrical potential during a period without artificial stimulation indicated that the magnitude of potential information flow across the sporocarps was not restricted to the sporocarps belonging to the same genet (clone) nor within a species. However, this was still negatively associated with genetic as well as spatial distances. Local addition of tap water to the base of a certain sporocarp significantly increased the average magnitude of information flow across the sporocarps, whereas the global addition of tap water to all the sporocarps greatly reduced the information flow. The addition of urine had minimal effect on the magnitude of information flow. These results indicate the presence of underground electrical information flows across fungal sporocarps which respond vigorously to the environmental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.