ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhanced solution absorption of free-base over protonated nicotine in aerosols.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elucidating the pharmacokinetic profiles of different chemical forms of nicotine (free-base versus protonated)—particularly their differences in biological absorption—is critically important for balancing its potential clinical applications in neurodegenerative disease therapy with effective management of its inherent addiction risk. Current empirical observations regarding which form exhibits superior absorption remain significantly divergent. This study employs an aerosol delivery model to compare the permeability (simulated absorption) of the two nicotine forms in solution by quantifying the amount absorbed and the residual nicotine after aerosol penetration through a simulated solution barrier. The results demonstrate that free-base nicotine exhibits higher solution absorption than its protonated counterpart. The superior absorption of free-base nicotine is primarily attributed to its diffusion from the particulate phase to the gas phase within aerosols, facilitating efficient mass transfer across the gas–liquid interface. These findings provide an in vitro experimental basis for further evaluation of the potential differences in human absorption efficiency between nicotine forms, thereby supporting the development of nicotine-based pharmaceuticals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.