ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
3D Spatiotemporal cardiac reconstruction for predicting MACE in acute myocardial infarction.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nursing management of deep vein thrombosis in children: a narrative review of challenges, evidence-based strategies, and systematic pathways.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Radiomics-Based Prediction Models for Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review of Predictive Performance, Validation, and Incremental Value.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence has made significant strides in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) following percutaneous coronary intervention. However, most existing methods rely solely on tabular variables derived from clinical data and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), without fully leveraging the predictive potential of the CMR imaging modality itself. Moreover, these approaches often overlook the synergistic benefits of multimodal integration between imaging and tabular data. In addition, current models primarily focus on short-term MACE risk assessment (e.g., within 6 months or 1 year), limiting their applicability for long-term prognostication. To address these limitations, we first developed ReconSeg3D, a model that reconstructs short-axis cine CMR stacks into temporally-resolved 3D bi-ventricular volumes, capturing fine-grained cardiac anatomy and dynamic motion. These bi-ventricular sequences were then integrated with 45 clinical and CMR-derived variables using spatiotemporal decomposition and cross-attention mechanisms to construct a multimodal MACE prediction model-HeartTTable. HeartTTable achieved a 5-year time-dependent AUC of 0.934 (95% CI 0.907-0.959) and a Harrell's C-index of 0.897 for predicting MACE risk, significantly outperforming models based solely on clinical and CMR-derived tabular features, and demonstrated strong capabilities in postoperative risk stratification. Our study contributes to improved long-term postoperative management for AMI patients by offering clinicians an objective, data-driven decision-support tool.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.