ArticleScientific reports2026
Tolerance of outbreak-associated Candida parapsilosis isolates to antiseptics in a dry surface biofilm model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis clinical isolates, originally recovered from healthcare workers’ hands during a hospital outbreak, to commonly used hospital antiseptics under a dry surface biofilm (DSB) model. Unlike traditional hydrated biofilm systems, DSBs replicate low-moisture, nutrient-limited environments frequently encountered on hospital surfaces and medical devices. Over 12 days, monospecies DSBs were formed on glass coverslips and exposed for 3 min to seven antiseptics preparations, namely ethanol 70% (EtOH 70%), 0.5% alcoholic chlorhexidine (CHG 0.5%), 1% aqueous chlorhexidine (CHG 1%), 0.12% aqueous chlorhexidine (CHG 0.12%), 10% povidone-iodine (PVPI), 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and 70% isopropanol (IPA). Viability was assessed by log10 CFU/mL reduction, with ≥ 4 log10 considered microbiologically effective. EtOH 70% and CHG 0.5% consistently achieved > 5 log10 reductions, maintaining high activity despite desiccation. In contrast, PVP-I, IPA and CHG 0.12% showed poor performance (< 1 log10 median reduction), while 1% CHG 1% and H2O2 displayed intermediate efficacy. Hierarchical clustering revealed four distinct susceptibility phenotypes, suggesting intraspecific variability in tolerance to desiccation and biocides. Comparisons with previous hydrated biofilm data indicated reduced antiseptic efficacy under dry conditions, particularly for PVP-I. These results underscore the resilience of C. parapsilosis DSBs and highlight the need to revise disinfection protocols to address phenotypic diversity and persistence in clinical settings, especially on high-touch surfaces and invasive devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.