Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41792163›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Real time fire and smoke detection using vision transformers and spatiotemporal learning.

Umesh Kumar Lilhore, Yogesh Kumar Sharma, Kavitha Venkatachari, Nikhil Kumar Jain, Sultan Aldossary, Shimaa A Hussien, Ehab Seif Ghith, Lidia Gosy Tekeste, Sarita Simaiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Umesh Kumar LilhoreSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Gautam Buddh Nagar, Greater Noida, 203201, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Yogesh Kumar SharmaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Green Field, Vaddeswaram, Guntur, AP, India.
Kavitha VenkatachariSchool of AI & Future Technologies, Universal AI University, 410201, Karjat, Maharashtra, India.
Nikhil Kumar JainCapgemini Technology Services India Limited, 139, 140 NSEZ, Phase-2, 201305, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sultan AldossaryDepartment of Computer Engineering and Information, College of Engineering in Wadi Alddawasir, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Wadi Addawasir, Saudi Arabia.
Shimaa A HussienElectrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Ehab Seif GhithDepartment of Mechatronics, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt.
Lidia Gosy TekesteEritrea Institute of Technology, Mai-Nefhi College, Mai Nefhi, Himbrti, Eritrea. lidiagosytekeste@gmail.com.
Sarita SimaiyaSchool of Computer Applications & Technology, Galgotias University, Gautam Buddh Nagar, Greater Noida, 203201, Uttar Pradesh, India. saritasimaiya@gmail.com.

Funding

Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University PNURSP2026R827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of fire and smoke in images and videos is essential for environmental monitoring and safety; however, the unpredictable nature of fires makes it a difficult task. Although traditional methods such as CNNs, LSTMs, and 3D-CNNs have made progress in fire detection, they frequently encounter difficulties in effectively integrating spatial and temporal information from both images and videos. In this study, we introduce a novel method that integrates Transformer attention mechanisms and Vision Transformers (ViTs) to enhance the precision of fire and smoke detection in both images and videos. ViTs are employed in our model to extract spatial features from images, leveraging their capacity to capture long-range dependencies, which are essential for the identification of fire and smoke. We utilise 3D-CNNs to extract spatiotemporal features from video sequences, while a Transformer encoder is used to track the evolution of fire and smoke over time. Furthermore, we execute various enhancements to optimise the model’s performance. These encompass enhanced temporal modelling, advanced self-attention mechanisms, and a multi-task learning framework to improve the model’s robustness by identifying potential hazards, such as smoke, fire, and other threats. In order to enhance the model’s adaptability to dynamic environments, we incorporate sophisticated data augmentation techniques and optimize it for real-time deployment on edge devices. To address the inherent class imbalance between fire and non-fire samples in existing datasets, we implemented targeted data augmentation and class-weighted learning strategies, ensuring equal representation and balanced training for improved generalization. The model was tested against two well-known datasets: the NASA Space Apps Challenge Dataset and Kaggle’s Fire Videos Dataset. Our method outperforms conventional methods, achieving 99.2% accuracy on the NASA dataset and 98.3% on the Fire Videos dataset. ResNet50, VGG16, LSTM, 3D-CNN, and hybrid ResNet50 + LSTM and VGG16 + 3D-CNN models, on the other hand, achieved accuracies ranging from 85% to 94%. This study’s findings show that our hybrid model is a more effective solution for real-time fire and smoke detection in real-world settings because of its improved integration of spatial and temporal features.

Indexed as

3D-CNNsFire detectionMultimodal fusionSmoke detectionSpatio-temporal featuresVision transformers

Identifiers

PMID41792163
PMCPMC12988158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.