Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41792140›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Bridging photocatalysis and artificial intelligence to maximize CH

Md Arif Hossen, Meherunnesa Prima, Azrina Abd Aziz, Nadeem A Khan, Yunus Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Md Arif HossenInstitute of River, Harbor and Environmental Science (IRHES), Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology, Chattogram, 4349, Bangladesh. arifhossen0101@cuet.ac.bd.
Meherunnesa PrimaDepartment of Chemistry, Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology, Chattogram, 4349, Bangladesh.
Azrina Abd AzizFaculty of Civil Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al- Sultan Abdullah, Gambang, Pahang, 26300, Malaysia.
Nadeem A KhanCivil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha, 61421, Saudi Arabia.
Yunus AhmedDepartment of Chemistry, Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology, Chattogram, 4349, Bangladesh. yunus.acctiu@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The photocatalytic CO2 conversion into value-added chemicals such as CH4 and CO is a highly promising sustainable approach to meet rising energy demands while mitigating atmospheric CO2 levels. This study investigates the prediction and optimization of CH4 and CO production using tree-based machine learning (ML) models applied to g-C3N4/TiO2 nanotube arrays (TNTAs) photocatalysts for gas-phase CO2 conversion. To predict the photoconversion rates of CO2 into CH4 and CO, several tree-based ML algorithms, including AdaBoost, Bagging, CatBoost, Decision Tree, Extra Trees, Gradient Boosting, HistGradientBoosting, LightGBM, RandomForest, and XGBoost were employed. The production of CH4 and CO (µmol/cm2) were designated as the target outputs, while input parameters included catalyst exposed surface area, initial concentration of CO2, feed pressure, light power, and irradiation time. The performance of ML algorithms was appraised using five statistical metrics. Bayesian optimization was employed to fine-tune the hyperparameters of the machine learning model algorithms. Among the evaluated models, CatBoost (CB) performed the most accurately, with R2 = 0.9887 (training) and R2 = 0.9883 (test) for CH4 production and R2 = 0.9885 (training) and R2 = 0.9874 (test) for CO production. Feature importance analysis and SHAP plots highlighted the significant influence of irradiation time and catalyst exposed surface area on the production efficiency of both products. Additionally, the input parameters were systematically optimized using CB model predictions, which were validated against experimental data and achieved almost similar prediction. These results support the effectiveness of ML-directed modeling in maximizing CO2 conversion efficiency and revealing the potential of data-driven strategies in steering photocatalytic technology.

Indexed as

CatBoost (CB)g-C3N4/TiO2 nanotube arrays (TNTAs)Machine learning (ML)Photocatalytic CO2 conversion

Identifiers

PMID41792140
PMCPMC13100332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.