ArticleNature communications2026
AMR-GNN: a multi-representation graph neural network framework to enable genomic antimicrobial resistance prediction.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AResKGLM: a graph-grounded language-model framework for interpretable multi-hop antimicrobial resistance reasoning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Integrating deep learning and pangenomics to recover missing heritability from wild structural variations.BMC genomics · 2026Review
- Improving the Precision of Etiological Diagnosis in Bacterial Infections Using Molecular Technologies: A Comparative Analysis of Platforms, AI Integration, and Point-of-Care Deployment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- AMR-GNN: a multi-representation graph neural network framework to enable genomic antimicrobial resistance prediction.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A comprehensive report on the 1st Swiss-EUCAST antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) meeting.FEMS microbiology letters · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data are an invaluable resource for understanding antimicrobial resistance (AMR) mechanisms. However, WGS data are high-dimensional and the lack of standardized genomic representations is a key barrier to AMR phenotype prediction. To fully explore these high-resolution data, we propose AMR-GNN, a graph deep learning-based framework that integrates multiple genomic representations with graph neural networks (GNN) to enable AMR phenotype prediction from genomic sequence data. We test AMR-GNN with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a clinically relevant Gram-negative bacterial pathogen known for its complex AMR mechanisms. We present AMR-GNN as a proof-of-concept framework designed to address several key problems in AMR phenotype prediction with data-driven machine learning (ML) approaches, including using multiple genomic representations to enhance performance, to mitigate the influence of clonal relationships and to identify informative biomarkers to provide explainability. Follow-up validation on the largest publicly available dataset spanning both Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens highlights AMR-GNN's broad applicability in detecting AMR in diverse and clinically relevant pathogen-drug combinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.