Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41792129›Full record

ReviewNature communications2026

Reflections on bio-based PET and plastic waste management: a responsible research and innovation approach.

Joanne Benton, Catalina Cruañas Paniker, Brooke Wain, José I Jiménez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joanne BentonDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Catalina Cruañas PanikerDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Brooke WainDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-7919-2857
José I JiménezDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK. j.jimenez@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2700-9473

Funding

ERA-CoBioTech programme of the EURCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/T011289/1RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/Y007972/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plastics drive twin crises: persistent pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Bio-based approaches using enzymes and microorganisms to depolymerise plastics and valorise monomers show promise but raise societal, ethical and regulatory questions central to Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). In this Perspective, we reflect on RRI implications of bio-based plastic degradation, informed by stakeholder discussions across the plastics value chain and public engagement. We identify broad support alongside concerns about scalability, interaction with existing recycling, governance and containment of genetically modified organisms, management of additives and contaminants, and the roles of regulation and economic incentives in enabling adoption.

Indexed as

PlasticsWaste ManagementBiodegradation, EnvironmentalRecyclingPlastics

Identifiers

PMID41792129
PMCPMC12972147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.