Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41792124›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Updating an allocentric goal from lateralised egocentric visual memories.

Antoine Wystrach, Florent Le Moël, Leo Clement, Sebastian Schwarz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antoine WystrachCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Centre de Biologie Intégrative, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France. antoine.wystrach@utoulouse.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3273-7483
Florent Le MoëlCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Centre de Biologie Intégrative, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-0083
Leo ClementCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Centre de Biologie Intégrative, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France.
Sebastian SchwarzCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Centre de Biologie Intégrative, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France.

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 101125881EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 759817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals navigate by combining egocentric (viewpoint-dependent) and allocentric (world-referenced) spatial representations, yet how their brains achieve this integration remains unclear. Here we show how the brains of insect expert navigators, such as ants, accomplish this task. Field experiments reveal that ants recognise long-term egocentric visual memories - assumed to be encoded in the Mushroom Bodies - via a lateralized mechanism: instead of memorising views while facing their goal, ants store these memories by looking to the sides. Recognition signals inform whether to turn left or right, but do not directly drive motor responses. Instead, they are processed separately - presumably in the two brain hemispheres - and integrated to update a goal heading in an ancestral, central brain region -the central complex. This goal heading -now anchored in an allocentric frame-is then used with celestial compass cues for robust steering. Computational models based on insect neural circuits validate this two-stage process, demonstrating how noisy, viewpoint-dependent lateralized inputs are transformed into stable allocentric directional control. These findings reveal how compact brains leverage bilateral processing to combine spatial representations for visual navigation.

Indexed as

AntsMemoryVisual PerceptionAnimalsBrainCuesGoalsMushroom BodiesSpace PerceptionSpatial Navigation

Identifiers

PMID41792124
PMCPMC13096645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.