Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41791879›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026

Increased and Coupled ERP and fMRI Responses toward Positive Social Evaluative Feedback: An EEG-fMRI Study.

Antje Peters, Kim Weiss, Hanne Helming, Carina Richarz, Meriya Chhteri, Robert Moeck, Thomas Straube, Sebastian Schindler

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Antje PetersInstitute for Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster 48149, Germany antje.peters@uni-muenster.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3602-0236
Kim WeissInstitute for Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster 48149, Germany.
Hanne HelmingInstitute for Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster 48149, Germany.
Carina RicharzInstitute for Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster 48149, Germany.
Meriya ChhteriInstitute for Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster 48149, Germany.
Robert MoeckInstitute for Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster 48149, Germany.
Thomas StraubeInstitute for Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster 48149, Germany.
Sebastian SchindlerInstitute for Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster 48149, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social-evaluative feedback is a key component of human social interaction, influencing self-view, behavior, and psychological well-being. This study investigates the neural mechanisms underlying social feedback processing in relation to self-view congruence. Participants (

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFeedback, PsychologicalMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleOxygenYoung AdultOxygenEEGfMRIsocial-evaluative feedback

Identifiers

PMID41791879
PMCPMC13055125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.