Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41791853›Full record

Observational studyUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2026

Radiomics-based ultrasOund Model for differentiating Uterine Sarcomas from leiomyomas (ROMUS): a retrospective pilot Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer (MITO) study.

F Ciccarone, A Rizzi, A Biscione, G Baldassari, E H Tran, T Pasciuto, F Moro, G Zinicola, F Buonomo, M Colombin and 14 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

F CiccaroneGynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2104-0602
A RizziGynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
A BiscioneOvarian Cancer Center, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Turin, Italy.
G BaldassariRadiomics G-STeP Research Core Facility, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8172-1093
E H TranRadiomics G-STeP Research Core Facility, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
T PasciutoData Collection G-STeP Research Core Facility, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
F MoroGynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5070-7245
G ZinicolaGynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
F BuonomoInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy.
M ColombinInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy.
F GhezziDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
J CasarinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Filippo Del Ponte' Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
R MancariGynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9726-3653
F BorellaObstetrics and Gynecology Unit 1, Department of Surgical Sciences, Sant' Anna Hospital, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8398-7557
A KardhashiGynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori 'Giovanni Paolo II', Bari, Italy.
M RoccioDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
L SavelliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ospedale Morgagni-Pierantoni, Forlì, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0961-7296
R CioffiDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4370-8271
F FanfaniGynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
G FerrandinaGynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
G ScambiaGynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
L ValentinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3830-6414
D LorussoGynecologic Oncology Unit, Humanitas San Pio X, Milan, Italy.
A C TestaGynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop machine-learning models that incorporate clinical information and radiomics features extracted from ultrasound images to distinguish uterine sarcomas from leiomyomas.

methodsThis retrospective, multicenter, pilot case-control study included 200 patients (100 with a uterine sarcoma and 100 with a usual-type leiomyoma, i.e. including no benign leiomyoma variants) who underwent preoperative ultrasound examination between January 2010 and June 2022. The patient cohort was split (70:30) into training and validation sets, with the same proportion of leiomyomas and sarcomas in each subset. We extracted radiomics features belonging to different families: intensity-based statistical features and textural features. The variables used in model building were patient age and the radiomics features that differed statistically significantly between sarcomas and leiomyomas and that were not redundant based on Spearman's correlation coefficient. Logistic regression, random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and support vector machine models were tested in the model development process. We evaluated the performance of the models in differentiating between sarcomas and leiomyomas using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. We compared these results to those of subjective assessment by the original ultrasound examiner and to those of two independent expert ultrasound examiners who, blinded to clinical history, reviewed the same grayscale ultrasound images as those used for the radiomics analysis.

resultsSixty-three radiomics features were extracted. Of these, eight differed statistically significantly between sarcomas and leiomyomas and were not correlated, so were selected for inclusion in model building. In the validation set, the model that performed best in differentiating between sarcomas and leiomyomas was an XGBoost model integrating patient age and radiomics features. In the validation set, this model had an AUC of 0.93, sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.83, at a risk-of-malignancy cut-off of 47% (the cut-off that yielded the highest number of correct classifications based on Youden's index in the training set). The corresponding results for the model integrating only the radiomics features were: AUC of 0.87, sensitivity of 0.87 and specificity of 0.83. Subjective assessment by the original ultrasound examiner had a sensitivity of 0.87 and specificity of 1 in the validation set, while retrospective review of grayscale ultrasound images by ultrasound experts had a sensitivity of 0.87 and specificity of 0.80 (same results for both reviewers).

conclusionA model including eight radiomics features and patient age demonstrated reasonably good discriminative and classification performance for distinguishing uterine sarcomas from leiomyomas. Its classification ability was similar to that of subjective assessment by the original ultrasound examiner, being more sensitive but less specific. To confirm the role of radiomics for discriminating between uterine sarcomas and leiomyomas, large prospective studies including benign leiomyoma variants are needed. If good performance of radiomics models can be confirmed, integrating automated radiomics analysis into ultrasound machine software may help ultrasound examiners to discriminate between sarcomas and benign leiomyomas. © 2026 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

LeiomyomaSarcomaUterine NeoplasmsAdultCase-Control StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansItalyMachine LearningMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyartificial intelligenceleiomyomaradiomicssarcomasultrasonographyuterine neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID41791853
PMCPMC13040125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.