Trial reportBMJ open respiratory research2026
Phase 2a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of londamocitinib (AZD4604) two times per day for 12 weeks in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma uncontrolled on medium-high-dose ICS-LABA.
Trial report in BMJ open respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phase 2a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of londamocitinib (AZD4604) two times per day for 12 weeks in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma uncontrolled on medium-high-dose ICS-LABA.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Trial
- Targeting Tight Junction Proteins to Restore Airway Epithelial Barrier Function in Asthma.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
- Biologic Use in Type 2 versus Non-Type 2 Asthma: Similarities, Differences, and Challenges.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Inflammation and Immune Dysregulation Across Respiratory Diseases: From Cellular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Targets.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAsthma is a heterogeneous condition and affected individuals show variable responses to available medications. An unmet need exists for add-on therapies that target novel molecular pathways, before patients escalate to biologics. Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) is implicated in multiple inflammatory cytokine pathways critical for the pathogenesis of asthma. Londamocitinib (AZD4604) is a highly specific, inhaled, JAK1 inhibitor with high potency to block multiple JAK1-dependent signalling pathways. AJAX is a phase 2a, randomised, double-blind, partially decentralised placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of londamocitinib in adults with moderate-to-severe asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint is time to first CompEx Asthma event. Secondary endpoints include change from baseline in prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s, chronic airways assessment test, six-item asthma control questionnaire, daily asthma symptom score, and morning and evening peak expiratory flow at weeks 4 and 12. In addition, assessment of the effect of londamocitinib on airway inflammation as measured by the fractional exhaled nitric oxide test; cough severity assessment; and the PK of londamocitinib in all participants after 4 and 12 weeks will also be evaluated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethical approval from the appropriate ethic committee and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice guidelines, and all applicable regulatory requirements. All participants will provide written informed consent prior to enrolment, with procedures in place to ensure comprehension and voluntary participation. Findings will be disseminated through peer‑reviewed publications and/or presentations at scientific conferences. Summary results will be posted on the trial registry and shared with participants and relevant patient groups in lay summaries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.