Societal consequences of IPS implementation in Norway 2012-2019: study protocol for the IPSRON effectiveness study.

introductionIndividuals experiencing moderate to severe mental illness have low rates of workforce inclusion, with a consequence of high welfare dependency, affecting both societal costs and health. Individual Placement and Support (IPS) is an approach to supported employment where the goal is to help people obtain jobs on the open rather than sheltered labour markets. Despite multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs) indicating that the IPS model enables employment better than treatment as usual, with widespread adoption in some jurisdictions, the broader impacts of this large-scale implementation on mental health, quality of life and social functioning remain unknown. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Between 2012 and 2019, Norway introduced IPS through both local and national government projects. This study assesses the social and economic benefits of the implementation of IPS using Norwegian registry data, focusing on 18-45-year-old people receiving specialist mental healthcare, and who did not have steady employment at treatment start. Instead of assessing IPS efficacy in an RCT design, we use a naturalistic study design, evaluating IPS effectiveness by comparing aggregate population-level outcomes over time between areas where IPS was not available.In work package (WP) 1, we mapped the availability and implementation of IPS across Norway. This involved analysing information on funding, resource and capacity levels to understand how IPS had been rolled out across the country. While completed, we include a description of WP1 here, as it informs WP2 and WP3. WP2 is an effectiveness evaluation investigating the population-level outcomes of implementing IPS, focusing on health, mortality, quality of life and social functioning. Finally, in WP3, we assess the financial implications of implementing IPS from a public purse perspective, synthesising data on resource use and costs of implementation with data from WP2.Overall, we will examine the societal effects of IPS implementation on employment, welfare dependency, mental healthcare use, emergency care visits, self-harm and suicide, general mortality, crime and victimisation. Emphasis will be on long-term outcomes, and we will model the economic consequences of IPS. This study aims to inform policy making and strategies for implementing IPS at scale. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This is an effectiveness study using registry data. The Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics Northern Norway, REK North has approved the use of registry data without informed consent for this project (approval number 134553).The findings will be disseminated both in academic peer-reviewed journals, directly to informants in WP1, to the public through media and the project website, and at relevant conferences and seminars for specific relevant target groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.