ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026
Examining the interaction between area-level immunity coverage and individual-level immunity to help quantify indirect herd benefits: a population-based retrospective cohort study of COVID-19 diagnoses and deaths.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Empirical evidence on the indirect herd benefits of COVID-19 vaccination and/or prior infection is limited. We examined how area-level immunity interacts with individual-level immunity to affect COVID-19 diagnoses and deaths. Ontario residents aged ≥18 years were followed from August 1, 2021, to January 30, 2022. Individual-level immunity was defined as receipt of a primary series of COVID-19 vaccines or a positive SARS-CoV-2 test in the past 165 days. Area-level immunity was based on the proportion of immune individuals in an individual's residing area. Logistic regression and cause-specific hazard models were used to examine the relationship between immunity and COVID-19 diagnosis, and between immunity and COVID-19 death, with an interaction term between individual-level and area-level immunity. Of 11 122 816 adults, 7 518 015 (67.6%) were classified as having individual-level immunity at baseline. After accounting for potential confounders, area-level immunity (highest vs. lowest quintiles) was associated with lower odds of COVID-19 diagnosis. Higher area-level immunity (highest vs. lowest quintiles) was also associated with lower hazard of COVID-19 death among non-immune individuals (hazard ratio, 0.77 [0.60, 1.00]). Findings provide evidence supporting the herd benefits of vaccination or prior infection on COVID-19 diagnosis and deaths, and provide insights for interpreting vaccine effectiveness estimates in the context of herd immunity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.