ArticleThe Journal of chiropractic education2026
The assessment of second year chiropractic students' comfort and confidence modifying care for vulnerable patient groups: A cross-sectional survey.
Article in The Journal of chiropractic education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate chiropractic students' comfort and confidence levels in modifying care for vulnerable patient groups. A second aim is to present data on students' self-identification as belonging to one or more of these groups. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 117 second-year students enrolled in a Special Populations course was conducted. Respondents selected special population groups (SPG) to which they identified as belonging. They rated their comfort interacting with and confidence levels modifying care for each SPG on a 5-point scale. A general patient group (GPG), representing patients not belonging to any SPG, served as a benchmark. Responses were grouped into 3 categories: those lacking comfort or confidence, those unsure or neutral, and those with comfort or confidence. Results: Comfort and confidence levels were found to be higher for the GPG than the SPG average. Perceptions of a sociocultural vulnerable subgrouping were much closer to GPG than a physically vulnerable subgrouping. Students perceived themselves most comfortable and confident with ethnically, racially, and religiously diverse patient groups and least comfortable and confident with physically and mentally disabled groups. Thirty-seven percent of respondents identified as belonging to one or more SPG. Conclusion: Respondents perceived their comfort levels to be higher than their confidence levels. Ratings for sociocultural vulnerable groups were higher than physically vulnerable groups. Gaps between comfort and confidence were higher in the sociocultural subgroup than the physically vulnerable subgroup. A significant minority of students identified as belonging to one or more of the studied groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.