ReviewJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH2026
Engineering bone marrow in a dish-a bloody business: preclinical opportunities, translational use cases, and a call for consensus.
Review in Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The bone marrow is the principal site of blood and immune cell production throughout the adult lifespan. Changes within bone marrow niches, which regulate hematopoiesis, directly contribute to age-related immune decline, an increased risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease, and the onset and progression of blood cancers. Targeting bone marrow dysfunction remains a major translational challenge, where species differences limit the predictive power of animal models and current in vitro systems fail to capture the cellular and architectural complexity that enables lifelong hematopoiesis. The pressing need in the field is for human alternatives. These should accelerate basic discovery (where direct experimentation on living marrow is neither ethical nor practical), personalized medicine (where efficacy and toxicity could be tested in patient relevant models to guide treatment decisions), and preclinical drug development. Advances in stem cell engineering, biomaterials, and microphysiologic systems have brought the idea of building a human bone marrow niche ex vivo closer to experimental reality. In this review, we examine recent advances in bone marrow organoid development through the lens of how these systems can meet translational needs. We propose that to coordinate progress across the field, there is a need to develop consensus benchmarks to define an ideal bone marrow organoid that can overcome translational barriers. We suggest that a bone marrow organoid should (1) reproduce the diverse stromal and hematopoietic lineages of the bone marrow, (2) self-organize into spatial architectures that recapitulate human hematopoietic niches, and (3) sustain lymphomyeloid output from progenitors over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.