ArticleMethods and applications in fluorescence2026
FLIM quality metric visualization as a means to validate consistency across large-area non-homogeneous FLIM datasets.
Article in Methods and applications in fluorescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robust and interpretable analysis of fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) data requires careful assessment of data across biological samples. Due to limitations in sample availability, difference in protein expression, photobleaching, or acquisition time, FLIM datasets are often susceptible to signal variability. This is only exacerbated with large field-of-view FLIM data, such as examining metabolic fluxes across whole tissue slices due to morphology changes. We adapt the FLIM F-value (or figure-of-merit) within our analysis as a statistical metric to capture the confidence in lifetime by comparing variance across fitted parameters, analogous to typical image SNR. In this study, we apply pixelwise and regional analysis of F-values across large-area FLIM datasets to identify image regions with similar confidence levels. Visualization of F-value distribution enables detection of acquisition outliers or poor-quality regions within a large mosaic collection, which can be flagged for reacquisition or removal. This approach enhances the statistical power of downstream biological interpretation by ensuring that only data with quantifiable and stable lifetime information are retained. To our knowledge, this is the first application of F-value mapping as a dataset-wide quality control measure in FLIM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.