ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Leveraging Naturalistic Driving Digital Biomarkers for Early Mild Cognitive Impairment Detection: Deep Learning Strategies.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer disease and related dementias are increasing worldwide, with early detection during the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage critical for timely intervention. Driving behavior, which reflects everyday cognitive functioning, has emerged as a promising, noninvasive, and inexpensive digital biomarker when paired with machine learning. However, prior research has often relied on controlled settings, high-level features, or assumptions that fail to capture the sporadic nature of MCI, leaving a gap in modeling naturalistic driving data for robust early detection.
objectiveThis study aims to address the limitations of prior work by developing deep learning strategies that leverage driving data collected in a naturalistic setting as digital biomarkers for early detection of MCI.
methodsClinically classified participants (8 with MCI and 14 cognitively normal; N=22) drove their personal vehicles under naturalistic conditions for several consecutive days. A total of 3 participants (2 cognitively normal and 1 MCI) withdrew before completing the experiments. In-vehicle sensors recorded GPS, accelerometer, and gyroscope signals, which were segmented into full trips and turning maneuvers. Three modeling strategies were compared: (1) single-view, (2) feature-level fusion, and (3) model-level late fusion. Classification models were trained and evaluated to assess their accuracy, discriminative ability, and participant-level performance.
resultsModels using full-trip data consistently outperformed turn-only inputs, with the best-performing model achieving 78% accuracy and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 77%. Turn-based inputs alone demonstrated limited discriminative power; however, combining them with trip data through late fusion improved performance, though not beyond the full-trip baseline. Participant-level analysis indicated that classification accuracy improved with increased data volume, and trip-wise modeling more effectively captured the episodic nature of MCI than majority-vote aggregation. A frequency-based risk score was proposed as an interpretable and flexible output, enabling practical application in clinical and community settings.
conclusionsNaturalistic driving behavior offers a scalable and noninvasive approach for early cognitive screening. Deep learning models using full-trip naturalistic driving data show promise for detecting MCI, with fusion strategies providing supplementary insights. This framework supports proactive, real-world monitoring of cognitive decline, laying the foundation for digital health interventions in dementia prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.