ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2026
Work environment of nurses in primary health care in Manaus: an analytical cross-sectional study.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the dimensions of the work environment of primary health care nurses (PHC) and its relationship with these professionals' sociodemographic characteristics.
methodThis was a cross-sectional, analytical study conducted between April and October 2024 with 243 PHC nurses in Manaus. A questionnaire and the Workplace Environment Assessment Scale were used. Descriptive and inferential analysis was performed.
resultsThe overall assessment of the work environment was average, with a score of 98.1. The average score for the Motivation for Work dimension was 47.2. The Workplace Safety dimension had the lowest average (14.6), classified as "attention", and Strategic Management for Healthy Work, with an average of 36.3, was classified as having warning points. A negative correlation was found between income and motivation, length of time working in PHC and management, age/length of work and job security. Temporary nurses evaluated strategic management more positively.
conclusionWeaknesses were identified in security and strategic management, highlighting the need for improvements in infrastructure, participatory management, and protection of professionals' health to promote a safer and healthier work environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.