Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41790876›Full record

ArticleScience advances2026

Trapped in declining occupations: Barriers to worker mobility in a changing economy.

Xi Song, Jennie E Brand, Sukie Xiuqi Yang, Michael Lachanski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xi SongDepartment of Sociology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3463-045X
Jennie E BrandDepartment of Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6568-498X
Sukie Xiuqi YangDepartment of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4756-6338
Michael LachanskiMcDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7571-6167

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The US has undergone substantial changes in jobs, occupations, and mobility over the past two decades. Using administrative data from the US Occupational Outlook Handbook (2000 to 2020), we examine how immediate and projected occupational restructuring affects workers' mobility. In an update to prior research, we find that workers in both growing and declining occupations experience greater mobility than those in stable occupations. However, the direction of movement varies. Workers in declining occupations often move laterally into other declining occupations, with nearly 60% experiencing downward mobility. In contrast, growing occupations offer better prospects for upward mobility, particularly for workers transitioning from declining to growing occupations, where almost 50% enter higher-paying occupations. However, these moves to emerging jobs are relatively rare, accounting for only 5% of all occupational movements. These results highlight how recent shifts in the occupational structure exacerbate existing disadvantages for workers facing declining job opportunities.

Indexed as

Career MobilityEmploymentOccupationsHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41790876
PMCPMC12965289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.