Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41790866›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Machine learning prediction of weight gain after antiretroviral therapy initiation in people with HIV: Insights from a large french real-world cohort.

Cyrielle Codde, Clément Benoist, Laurent Hocqueloux, Cyrille Delpierre, Clotilde Allevena, Amélie Ménard, Antoine Chéret, Cédric Arvieux, Jean-François Faucher, Jean-Baptiste Woillard and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cyrielle CoddeDepartment of infectious diseases, Dupuytren 2 University Hospital, Limoges, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3831-1904
Clément BenoistInserm Pharmacology & Toxicology, U 1248, F-87000, Limoges University, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6335-7474
Laurent HocquelouxDepartment of infectious diseases, Orléans University Hospital, Orléans, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2264-4822
Cyrille DelpierreToulouse University, Toulouse, France.
Clotilde AllevenaDepartment of infectious diseases, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1010-1270
Amélie MénardDepartment of infectious diseases, Marseille University Hospital Instutit, Marseille, France.
Antoine ChéretDepartment of infectious diseases, Kremlin Bicêtre University Hospital, Paris, France.
Cédric ArvieuxDepartment of infectious diseases, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2332-2507
Jean-François FaucherDepartment of infectious diseases, Dupuytren 2 University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Jean-Baptiste WoillardInserm Pharmacology & Toxicology, U 1248, F-87000, Limoges University, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1695-0695
Dat’AIDS Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excessive weight gain after initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) has become a recognized concern among people living with HIV. Individual weight trajectories remain highly heterogeneous and challenging to predict using conventional methods. We leveraged the French Dat'AIDS national cohort to assess whether machine learning (ML) could enhance the prediction of individual body weight at 6, 12, and 24 months after ART initiation. Using 112 baseline variables encompassing demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment-related data, we trained XGBoost models and evaluated performance using root mean square error (RMSE), R², and mean prediction error. A simple benchmark model based on baseline weight was used for comparison. Among 24,014 eligible ART-naïve adults, the ML models achieved RMSEs of approximately 4.6 kg, 5.3 kg, and 6.4 kg at 6, 12, and 24 months respectively, with declining predictive power over time. Baseline weight (Weight_M0) consistently emerged as the strongest predictor, while other factors contributed minimally. Although ML marginally outperformed the benchmark (Weight_M0), accuracy remained insufficient for clinical decision-making. Sensitivity analyses excluding individuals with implausibly large monthly weight changes modestly improved RMSE (3.9-6.0 kg), underscoring the impact of data quality. Our results demonstrate that, despite large sample size and rich clinical variables, ML lacks the precision necessary for individual weight forecasting in this context. These findings highlight the limitations of applying artificial intelligence to heterogeneous real-world cohorts and underscore the need to incorporate behavioral and lifestyle factors to improve predictive modeling.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsMachine LearningWeight GainAdultBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsCohort StudiesFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID41790866
PMCPMC12965677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.