ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Contrastive learning for passive acoustic monitoring: A framework for sound source discovery and cross-site comparison in marine soundscapes.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is a powerful tool for studying marine biodiversity, but large-scale analysis of underwater recordings is constrained by noise, overlapping signals, and limited labeled data. Here, we present a scalable, unsupervised contrastive learning framework for marine soundscapes. Using a large PAM dataset spanning multiple biogeographies, we show that the proposed approach organizes recordings into clusters with well-defined internal structure, as assessed using intrinsic clustering metrics and within-cluster similarity. The resulting clusters reveal recurring acoustic patterns that correspond to broad sound-source categories, including biological sounds such as fish calls and choruses, and anthropogenic sounds such as vessel noise, without explicitly enforcing these distinctions during training. Compared with established approaches, including cepstral features, variational autoencoders, and supervised pipelines, the proposed framework produces embeddings that support more compact and stable unsupervised clustering while preserving fine-scale acoustic variation beyond predefined species labels. By learning a shared representation across recordings from multiple sites and years, we examine the reproducibility of acoustic patterns across locations and identify both site-shared and site-specific sound signatures. Although the method is not designed to recover coarse species labels, it enables label-efficient analysis by reducing reliance on manual annotation and supporting exploratory characterization of complex marine soundscapes. Together, these results highlight multi-positive contrastive learning with a teacher network and acoustically informed augmentations as an effective strategy for scalable, discovery-driven analysis of passive acoustic monitoring data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.