Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41790830›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

ConNIS and labeling instability: New statistical methods for improving the detection of essential genes in TraDIS libraries.

Moritz Hanke, Theresa Harten, Ronja Foraita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Moritz HankeDepartment Statistical Methods in Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Bremen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7135-2690
Theresa HartenIndependent Researcher, Hamburg, Germany.
Ronja ForaitaDepartment Statistical Methods in Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of essential genes in Transposon Directed Insertion Site Sequencing (TraDIS) data relies on the assumption that transposon insertions occur randomly in non-essential regions, leaving essential genes largely insertion-free. While intragenic insertion-free sequences have been considered as a reliable indicator for gene essentiality, so far, no exact probability distribution for these sequences has been proposed. Further, many methods require setting thresholds or parameter values a priori without providing any statistical basis, limiting the comparability of results. Here, we introduce Consecutive Non-Insertion Sites (ConNIS), a novel method for gene essentiality determination. ConNIS provides an analytic solution for the probability of observing insertion-free sequences within genes of given length and considers variation in insertion density across the genome. Based on an extensive simulation study and different real-world scenarios, ConNIS was found to be superior to prevalent state-of-the-art methods, particularly when libraries had only a low or medium insertion density. In addition, our results showed that the precision of existing methods can be improved by incorporating a simple weighting factor for the genome-wide insertion density. To set methodically embedded parameter and threshold values of TraDIS methods a subsample-based instability criterion was developed. Application of this criterion in real and synthetic data settings demonstrated its effectiveness in selecting well-suited parameter/threshold values across methods. An R package and an interactive web application are provided to facilitate application and reproducibility.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsGenes, EssentialMutagenesis, InsertionalSequence Analysis, DNAAlgorithmsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationGene LibraryDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID41790830
PMCPMC12991369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.