ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Comparative susceptibility of Old World and New World bat cell lines to Zika virus: Insights into viral replication and inflammatory responses.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe emergence of flaviviruses and other arboviruses in novel geographic locations, arthropod vectors, and vertebrate amplification hosts complicates control and eradication efforts. Many flaviviruses continue to impact global health, including Zika virus (ZIKV) which has expanded to a global health threat, yet many questions remain surrounding its ecology and inter-epidemic maintenance. While bats are known to harbor several medically important viruses without clinical disease, their role in the sylvatic transmission cycle of arboviruses remains unresolved. Reports describing the susceptibility of different bat species to infection with ZIKV are inconsistent, and the immunological mechanisms underpinning this variability have not been well-characterized. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsWe compared the permissiveness and immune responses of cell lines derived from two frugivorous bat species: the Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus) and Jamaican fruit bat (Artibeus jamaicensis). Using multi-step growth curves, we compared infection dynamics of two genetically distinct ZIKV strains, African lineage (ZIKV/MR766) and Asian-American lineage (ZIKV/PRVABC59) and compared transcriptomic responses to both lineages in susceptible bat-derived cell lines. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results highlight species-specific differences in ZIKV susceptibility across bat-derived cell lines, with both ZIKV strains replicating to high titers on R. aegyptiacus cells but not on A. jamaicensis cells. We detected pro-inflammatory transcriptomic signatures in R. aegyptiacus cells infected with both ZIKV lineages. Notably, both the Asian-American and African ZIKV lineages demonstrated some capacity for immune evasion and productive replication in the R. aegyptiacus cell line.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.